Double standards: what you judge vs what you do
A reflection on social norms, human contradiction and the criteria we apply differently when it suits us.
The discomfort starts here
We all judge, even if we don’t always admit it.
Why do we criticize in others what we later justify in ourselves?
We decide what is right, what is wrong, what is acceptable and what should not happen. We comment, point out and criticize.
But then, at certain moments, we do exactly the same things we question in others.
That is where double standards appear.
What we point out
We criticize behaviors, decisions and ways of living when we see them in others.
Most discussedIt does not always come from bad intentions
Many times, it comes from the need to fit in, protect our image or avoid internal conflict.
It is hard to accept that we are not as consistent as we would like to be.
See new debates →The criteria change depending on who acts
We make them more flexible when it comes to us. More rigid when it comes to others.
And that is when social norms stop being shared rules and become tools of judgment.
Double standards reveal discomfort
Sometimes what we judge most outside is exactly what we do not want to look at inside.
That is why it bothers us so much. That is why we react so quickly. Because it is easier to point outward than to look inward.
Maybe the real question is not whether we are consistent, but whether we are willing to be when it makes us uncomfortable.
Now it’s your turn
Have you ever judged something… and then ended up doing the same?
View trends
0 Comments